, 2015; Cardoso and you may Souza, 2016; Santiago and you will Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you will Jalalzai, 2021). In this works we will work at misogyny due to the fact identified by the interviewees relating to Rousseff’s six ages inside stamina, particularly focusing on the connection between misogynistic backlash and the gendered twice bind figure known. On following point we offer a far more nuanced definition having each of the subcategories identified (discover Dining table dos), taking remain-alone significance and you will advice from the data in conjunction with detailed analyses off key moments inside the Rousseff’s presidency you to exemplify the new vibrant ranging from all of our nuanced proposition getting looking at the fresh new gendered double bind, misogynist backlash, and its particular consequence to your Rousseff’s presidency.

This new four subcategories understood appeared in the knowledge in the differing profile (discover Dining tables 3, 4). A few layouts starred in large ratio: Comparison in order to Guys and Misogynyments inspired due to the fact analysis so you’re able to dudes appeared for the almost half of all interviews and you can portrayed 36 % out-of most of the statements codifiedments inspired given that misogyny was basically most comments (38 per cent) and appeared in 44 % of all interviews. This means that, interviewees was in fact very cognizant of Rousseff’s role since president in contrast for other men politicians and you will previous presidents, additionally the suggests Rousseff was penalized while in the their own management because of gendered expectation and you will backlash.

While you are looking with shorter volume on interviews, another several layouts promote extremely important context so you can wisdom you can sexist backlash during the presidency off Brazil’s very first lady chairman. Conversations about how precisely Rousseff tried to comply with gendered criterion ascribed so you can women (Conforming to the Twice Bind) starred in more 10 % of one’s remark coded and you will interviews held. At the same time, discussion about how exactly Rousseff challenged new gendered hopes of her updates (Problematic the latest Twice Join) appeared in more you to definitely fifth of the many interviews, constituting sixteen percent of all statements coded.

Brand new description of the numerical thickness of the thematic research will bring a kick off point so you can an excellent qualitative investigation of each and every motif, targeting the connection between each motif, especially the partnership within three themes physically related to the newest gendered double bind (review, complying, and you may difficult) plus the misogynistic backlash one to adopted.

Analysis so you’re able to men

Among the subcategories understood was contrasting out of Dilma Rousseff to help you dudes, one another contrasting Rousseff in order to male people in politics and explaining how anything would-be other in the event the Rousseff had been men. Hence, i unearthed that there was one another a conceptual role and fundamental component to her testing to men. During the a conceptual feel, we frequently spotted the expression, “when the she have been a guy” to describe exactly how a posture could have played out in different ways had Dilma maybe not come a woman. The new story illustrated inside our interview are from a system one to “favors men” (Respondent 88, ), which have “zero open gender discrimination, although fact that [good politician] is a guy is a plus” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever revealing this comparison so much more concretely, there is a look closely at Rousseff’s abrasive personality, brand new “tough lady as much as tender dudes.” This new quotation less than will bring a whole lot more perspective:

Talks on Rousseff’s impeachment plus the sexism and you may misogyny about brand new procedure have been talked about when you look at the well-known mass media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and Kaiser, 2016) plus scholarly really works (Zdebskyi ainsi que al

Yes, and mentioned that she are a hard people, one she cannot keep in touch with anyone, you to definitely she got an enthusiastic authoritarian technique for talking. Everything that for men appears as an accompany “no, he could be a hard people, a self-sure individual that understands just what he wishes.” To help you her is presented because the negative “no, she cannot can cam, she is difficult, the woman is which” for the a negative method. How they communicate with united states, feminine. I’ve attained a specific condition, the audience is getting severe, the audience is deviating of so you can how to be a female, that is nice, clear, hushed and klicka fГ¶r att fГҐ veta mer you may including. The form of Dilma getting ‘s the type of women that be able to be good within this an entirely patriarchal community, against so it buy that can be obtained (Respondent 79, ).